There are those that claim if it cannot be proved by science, discard it and dump it in the river. They feel that it is either science that proves absolutely everything or nothing at all. As soon as they make this clear, then go into their tirades against religion, alternative thoughts, and anything that doesn't agree with them.
Unfortunately even when the same people want to claim that belief has nothing to do with science, it is obvious that they don't realize that claim is nothing more then their own belief system. Sure, they have some facts to back things up, but so do others that see the world through different eyes. If you believe science has the answers, that is your belief system. To fail to understand that is ignorance.
There are things that science cannot prove today as 100% fact or not 100% fact. There are things in the past that science claimed was true, but were woefully ignorant and wrong. Science is based upon theory that has facts to support it, but it does not account for everything we know or we think we know.
Even though religion thinks it has all the facts, it is woefully mistaken. Religion uses belief based upon some (limited) facts of what really happened. Through that belief, all truth is derived. It is often at odds with science and I'm not here to give it validation or justification.
There are things we don't understand and in fact there is so much we don't understand. Yet, we claim that science has all the answers. Most of the time, I would agree but there are situations and circumstances that science is not able to prove that which we can see and experience.
Maybe science has not caught up to the time we are in. Maybe science just doesn't know yet how to make sense of that which is before our eyes. Does this mean science is not enough? It may in the moment, but it could change in the future. We don't need to shun science, but we need to put more effort into it, so that we can prove or disprove the unknowns.
To form such a rigid thought process of either religion or science having all the answers is ignorant at best. To see the validity of both sides is to be an individual with a higher consciousness of thoughts. You can't claim everyone that believes differently than you are wrong while claiming you don't have your own belief system called science. You may be fooling yourself, but you're not fooling everyone.
Some latch on to what some say without question and gulp it down as if they have the ultimate set of facts and truth. This is a recipe for missing what may be standing in front of their eyes. I believe (it is my opinion) that in another 100 years or 1000 years, what we thought was ridiculousness now, may be a normally accepted truth based upon science.
Blog Post And Images (c) 1/23/16 by Don Shetterly
- Permission required before any part of this blog post is reprinted, reworded or used in any form.
- You are welcomed to share the LINK to this blog post.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is one example that shows science is wrong. Newton's first law - An object will continue in motion, in a straight line with a constant speed. Have you seen such an object on earth or in space? No. Therefore Newton is wrong. Newton assumed isolated environment. All theory of science has assumptions, and since nature cannot make assumptions, all physics theories must be wrong.
ReplyDeleteAnd here is an example from religion which is correct. Destiny is a law of nature, which means there is no freewill. Have you ever done anything without a reason? No. Therefore all your actions are controlled by your past reasons. Therefore you do not have freewill.
Laws of nature are the only truth. If you think religion is all about God, morality, good-bad, sinners, good karma or bad karma etc.then all religions are different and wrong. But if you think religions describe the laws of nature then all religions are same and correct. Bible and Vedas talk about the following laws of nature - reincarnation, destiny, yogic power, soul theory, eternal recurrence, etc. For more on science and laws, proofs and examples, take a look at https://theoryofsouls.wordpress.com/
Here is one example that shows science is wrong. Newton's first law - An object will continue in motion, in a straight line with a constant speed. Have you seen such an object on earth or in space? No. Therefore Newton is wrong. Newton assumed isolated environment. All theory of science has assumptions, and since nature cannot make assumptions, all physics theories must be wrong.
ReplyDeleteAnd here is an example from religion which is correct. Destiny is a law of nature, which means there is no freewill. Have you ever done anything without a reason? No. Therefore all your actions are controlled by your past reasons. Therefore you do not have freewill.
Laws of nature are the only truth. If you think religion is all about God, morality, good-bad, sinners, good karma or bad karma etc.then all religions are different and wrong. But if you think religions describe the laws of nature then all religions are same and correct. Bible and Vedas talk about the following laws of nature - reincarnation, destiny, yogic power, soul theory, eternal recurrence, etc. For more on science and laws, proofs and examples, take a look at